Skip to main content

Caprice no. 4


When preparing to record Caprices 1-4, this was the one that held me up and admittedly caused some anxiety for the recording session. The culprit was the jeté stroke, featured prominently at the beginning of the caprice. Having never played violin in my earlier days, I was excused from having to learn this stroke, and developed jeté phobia as a result.

So kudos to Campagnoli for believing that violists can do it too. It isn't the most practical, everyday manner in which we use the bow- but if you master it, you have really accomplished a hyper-control of your bow hand. At least that's how I felt once I got the technique down.

To practice the jeté stroke for this piece, I spent a lot of time on open strings practicing a semi-controlled bounce of the bow. The challenge is that the four times it happens, it is over an eight-note descending scale, each one a note lower then the last - meaning that your open string pattern will be slightly different each time. Of course the tension of each string affects the bounce of the bow differently, and therein lies the challenge. You have to know exactly how much to control the bounce of the bow each time you play a different scale. Furthermore, eight notes is a lot of notes!

Anyway, I first started with the basic stroke, practicing four notes of jeté on an open string followed by a long "landing" note. I then increased to eight notes. Next, I practiced the open string patterns from each scale in the piece. Finally, I had to let go of any real sense of control and just play it, because in the end this stroke is like a cat: not fully domesticable. (Cat owners, you know...)

At the end of the jeté section (m. 7), I chose to take a liberal pause before starting the section marked dolce. Starting on an open string seemed to harsh, so I went with a fourth finger for a softer sound and to keep with the bariolage stroke that follows. The entire section, building up to m. 17, is driven by the bass notes, and the high E's in m. 13 particularly need a light touch.

Our jeté friend returns in m. 17, this time in an easier format: slower with less notes. I had the best results starting it as an up-bow staccato and transitioning midway to the jeté stroke.

At the end, we once more end on a half-cadence. This one does not resolve into Caprice no. 5. However, maybe by this round I've just gotten used to the question-endings, but it doesn't seem as quizzical to me any longer: rather like the music just needs to float off into thin air.

After all the bowing struggles with this caprice, I have to admit: it has become one of my favorites to date! Isn't that often the case though. We love something more when we've had to work harder for it.







Popular posts from this blog

Caprice no. 41

I couldn't think of a better way to end an epic book of caprices. Caprice number 41 is a grand bookend for a grand project. I used to think number 17 was my favorite, but this piece took the cake once I discovered it. It is joyful and stately. And the sonority it draws out of the instrument makes the solo viola sound like a chamber group.  Perhaps it's the crescendo of energy and sound output. This can heard and also clearly seen in the music, at about  measure 26 , going on to the end of the piece. Double-stops and bariolage, and sometimes both at once, make the viola into a mini-organ. This was my favorite section to play because I felt awash in sound.  This piece mostly tries to be a fugue, but also reaches for something greater. In fact, it reminds me a lot of the fourth movement of Hindemith's Op.11, No.5 sonata (another favorite of mine). The Hindemith obviously came later, and is much longer and more fantastical. But both pieces give you the feeling that you have bee

Caprice no. 38

We're almost at the end of this book, and in Caprice number 38, Campagnoli takes his hat off to Rodolphe Kreutzer and his 42 Etudes for Violin (1796), by quoting Etude #2. And guess where it happens: at measures 41-42. Is this a coincidence of numbers? Knowing how deliberate Camapagnoli was, I think probably not. We don't know about the two composers' relationship, but it is very likely that they knew each other, and obvious that there was admiration. This all but confirms my theory that Campagnoli held the great Kreutzer in such regard that he wrote 41 caprices, one less than his contemporary. Many of Campagnoli's caprices have a strong focus on bowing. However, Caprice 37 is all about the left hand. And wow - did my left hand feel like it was going to fall off after recording this piece. (even though I was in great shape!) Having said that, it was very important to let my bow arm drive the momentum as much as possible. Almost all of our expression comes from the bow,

Caprice no. 24

I love number 24 for its completeness. Its form is reminiscent of many Baroque compositions, where short movements are packaged together (often alternating slow/fast tempi) to collectively make a piece that is about the same length as a long pop song. Campagnoli utilized the variation to include many different techniques: double-stops, bass and treble voicing, fast passagework, and string crossings. I am glad the fast movements were not any longer. The single take recording was quite a challenge!